All Debts Are Pre-Paid – But Y’all Don’t Know Dat, So Continue to be Slaves Of a Fraudulently Operated System to Pay Mortgages/Loans/Taxes/Fines/Fees/Fiat Currency’s Blindly, Making the Central Banking Cartels incredibly Wealthy, as they use this trick called ‘MONEY’ to steal the very wealth right from under y’all noses, because your too preoccupied with the institutional ideology set upon y’all from before you were even born.
So of you believing in education and Schooling as a means to get ahead in the working world 🌍 and use the remainder of y’all time indulging in the Mass Media Propaganda and complete distraction of your time, whilst the ‘Elitist’ continues to bombard y’all with alternatives like the classic divide and conquer.
While everyone is fighting and criticising each other over trivial things, some very clever individuals are raking in your hard earned ‘Real Estates’ and consuming all your energies.
Did Y’all realise that all wars in the last 200 years was funded on purpose by that same elite groups of individuals. They have rationalised that, if your uncooperative nations of indigenous peoples are given passive but purposeful Media lies and propaganda, along with guns and false ideas to promote, that they can actually get y’all to gather up the most physically strong and courageous fighting forces (mainly all your children) to start wars with each other and wipe themselves out , but not completely, as some are needed to continue the work load for the elites, and allow the elites to take up governance over your nations of relatively weak and war torn, and battered people, drained after such actions, and rule over y’all?
See the Rothschilds Work – And Hand Of Destruction to each and every nation since they deceived us all centuries ago Below!
How risky is sovereign debt?
One memorable answer, “Countries don’t go bankrupt,” is attributed to Walter Wriston, the most prominent banker of his day and the Chairman of Citibank from 1967 to 1984. That is right in a narrow legal sense, since a sovereign government cannot be put into bankruptcy. But in the general sense, everybody knows it is disastrously wrong: governments can and do go broke and not pay on their debt.
The 1980s dramatically falsified the Wriston answer. A large number of governments with heavy borrowings from U.S. banks were broke and defaulting. This led to highly-placed fears that the entire American banking system might be insolvent. So Paul Volcker, then Chairman of the Federal Reserve, papered over the crisis by ordering that the banks’ books be cooked and losses postponed. When the crisis broke in 1982, Volcker is reported to have said one Friday evening, “The American banking system might not last until Monday”!
More recently, we have had the European sovereign debt crisis of 2009-2012, which threatened the entire European banking system, imposed huge losses on lenders to the government of Greece-they got 25 cents on the dollar in the 2012 debt restructuring–and raised the possibility of more big losses on the debts of Italy, Spain and Portugal. Of course, the insolvency of the Greek government is still playing out. Demonstrating a typical lack of imagination, European officials had claimed that sovereign defaults in Europe were unthinkable.
How often do governments go broke and default on their debts? Quite often, it turns out. In the last 100 years, from 1915 to 2015, there were 189 cases of sovereign defaults and restructurings. This involved 80 countries-many were multiple defaulters. In the last 50 years, from 1965 to now, there have been 123 defaults involving 68 countries. In this period, many new sovereign nations had been created, so it gave the possibility, or rather near certainty, or more sovereign defaults.
The following chart displays the 100-year pattern of sovereign defaults by decade. Note the peaks in the 1930s and 1980s, fifty years apart. The 1990s are in third place for this dubious prize, followed by the decade 2000-2010.
Sources: Reinhart, Carmen M., and Kenneth S. Rogoff. 2008. “The Forgotten History of Domestic Debt.” NBER
The defaults on this graph include many Latin American, African and Asian countries, but Europe and North America are also well represented.
The United States government appears three times: when it defaulted on its gold bonds in 1933; when it rejected its obligation to redeem silver certificates for silver in 1968; and when it reneged on its Bretton Woods commitment to redeem dollars for gold in 1971. With this last default, it launched the world into an unprecedented experiment in pure fiat currencies with floating exchange rates-an experiment whose implications we are still discovering. Note that each of the U.S. government’s defaults involved refusing to honor its promise to pay in precious metals. Now its debt is payable only in a paper currency which its central bank earnestly promises to depreciate every year in perpetuity.
To give a flavor of the variety of countries in the sovereign default club, here are the lists for the worst three decades of the last century:
1930s: Austria, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada (Alberta), Chile, China, Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Romania, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Yugoslavia.
1980s: Angola, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Central African Republic, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Ivory Coast, Jordan, Liberia, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nigeria, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uruguay, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Zambia.
1990s: Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Brazil, Bulgaria, Croatia, Ecuador, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kenya, Kuwait, Mongolia, Morocco, Nigeria, Russia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Thailand, Ukraine, Uruguay, Venezuela.
“The history of government loans is really a history of government defaults,” wrote Max Winkler, in his instructive and cynical book, Foreign Bonds: An Autopsy. History “is replete with instances of governmental defaults,” Winkler observed. “When payment is resumed, the past is easily forgotten and a new borrowing orgy ensues.” That was written in 1933, but is fully up to date.
In all cases, of course, it is a government which is in debt and defaulting, not the country itself. One source of sovereign default is when governments are overthrown and the new regime repudiates the debt of the old one. Notable cases are Russia in 1917 and China in 1949. Another source of default is losing a big war and disappearing as a government, as with Germany, Japan and the Confederate States of America.
But far more common is years of excessive borrowing, whether optimistic or opportunistic, followed by simply being broke and inviting the creditors to join in the losses.
How risky is sovereign debt? Far riskier than good times complacently assume.
As many emerging market countries struggle financially and economically today, are we approaching a new round of sovereign defaults and restructurings? There is certainly no reason to believe that government defaults are out of style. They will occur as long as governments love to spend and love to borrow to keep spending, and as long as lenders have short memories-that is, forever.
Alex J. Pollock is a distinguished senior fellow at the R Street Institute in Washington, D.C. He was President and CEO of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago from 1991-2004
Dr cheik anta diop Pre-Historical Facts Unfolds
Thank You for your interest and activity, however, the universe thanks you more. Nationality is not really a process except for if and when it starts in the mind, as you now already know, if you didn’t before.
It has apparently awakened in you, thus Declaring it is to be clear yourself and does not necessarily require any paperwork, but does require study to be clear yourself, as you can only be what you know.
Proclaiming is the publishing, and that is where the ‘paperwork’ comes in. Anything in written form is but a brief expressing your position regarding a matter, whatever that matter may be and that includes the card itself, which is a brief and lawful claim.
Friday 14 April 2017 09:13AM
Identity: Evidence, sameness; the fact that a subject, person, or thing before a court is the same as it is represented, claimed or charged to be.
Person: In general usage, person means a human being (i.e. a ‘natural person’); though by statute, a ‘person’ may include a firm, labor organizations, partnerships,
trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Corporations are “persons” as that word is used in the first clause of the 14th Amendment
Therefore, if you are operating with 14th amendment, you are SAYING loudly, you are a corporation!!!
“There is no need for the application of the 14th and 15th amendment for the salvation of our people and citizens” – Prophet Noble Drew Ali
THIS PAGE NAVIGATION:
- About Status •
1a. About Ex Rel and Nom Deguerre •
- Identification Arrest Laws? •
2a. Correcting ‘Name” •
Common Law Name Correction PDF •
- State Fed and Local Government •
4 International Declarations •
Preamble Rights of Indigenous People PDF •
Enforcement and Encouragement •
- About Travel Card •
About Student Card •
About Choosing Appellation Title •
IMPORTANT NOTICE •
FYI Taxes •
Divine Constitution and By-Laws •
About Test •
Sealing Proclamation Papers •
Nationality Test 1 PDF •
Nationality Test 2 PDF •
- Application Form For Cards •
These cards, whether obtained seperately or all at one time are NOT a Sovereignty package, or a part of a sovereignty package. They are identification Cards. We do not sell sovereignty, it is NOT for sale. We deal with Birthrights, Natural Rights, Liberties that come from the shear act of being born.
It is very interesting that if anyone were to get an identification and a drivers license and a school ID from a corporation, or any Institution, they do not call it a sovereign
Important Message Regarding National Identification Card:
One may be employed, do business, and enter into other contracts, and sue and be sued under any name they choose at will (Lindon v. First National Bank 10 F. 894, Coppage v. Kansas 236 U.S. 1, In re McUlta 189 F. 250).
The judicial or court method of changing one’s name, is merely an affirmance and aid of the “Common law”.
Thus, the common law, by superiority, establishes ‘supreme validation’, and suffices to serve Public Notice for Declaration of a Name Correction and Change, The ‘court method’ of corroborating a ‘name correction and change’ is not to be assumed as being necessary nor superior, but merely a formalized method of confirming or acknowledging a person’s right to a name correction or change.
Such a change carries the exact same legal weight as a court decreed name change as long as it is not done with fraudulent intent (In re McUlta 189 F. 250, Christianson v. King County 196 F. 791, United States v. McKay 2 F.2d 257).
IF YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO BE WHO YOU SAY YOU ARE AND EXERCISE YOUR UNALIENABLE RIGHTS OF BIRTH AND DEFEND YOUR ALLODIAL IDENTIFICATION YOURSELF, DO NOT APPLY FOR THIS CARD. At the same time be willing to accept the following fact:
“Your Nationality Card is going to change on you in your pocket.”
–Prophet Noble Drew Ali
It is advised that you read, review, and study this ENTIRE page regarding identification / identification cards / name corrections and / or change, prior to applying and obtaining a universal allodial identification card.
“If you don’t do anything else —
Declare Your Nationality”
— Prophet Noble Drew Ali
And then ‘we’ suggest you live your life accordingly,
beginning with your ‘Status’ as it sets the Stage for Matters of Jursidiction
Status: is “the standing, the state, or the condition; being a social position”. It is the legal relation of an individual to the rest of the community. Status also relates to the rights, the duties, the capacities and the incapacities, which determine a person to a given class. It is the legal, personal relationship, not temporary in its nature, nor terminable at the mere will of the parties, with which third persons and the state are concerned. While the term implies relation it is not a mere relation, it is a legal relation AND it establishes estate, since it also signifies the condition or circumstances in which one stands in regard to his property.
Note: Your Status sets the stage for Jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction: essentially the right to adjudicate (decide) regarding another. Jurisdiction covers, encompasses, assimilates and incorporates every type and kind of ‘Judicial Action’. Judicial actions pertain to authoritative actions and issues involving ‘Justice’ and the administration of ‘Justice’ in matters of “Rights of Parties”, Rights of Property”, and Judicial Proceedings, etc.
Jurisdiction equates to ‘Right Words’; as Juris means ‘Right’ and Diction means ‘words’.
Angela Marks – January 10, 2017
YouTube – Gas Supplies
Tags: Transco, National Grid, British Gas, NPower, Siemens, Pay as you go Meters, smart meters, gas scams, is it lawful to remove a gas meter from your property, buy gas meters on eBay, transco employee says it’s ok to install your own gas meter using a qualified gas engineer, who owns the gas
Gas Supplies – Is it all a Scam?
ActingNetworks.com: Most Popular Articles?
If You Like this blog post? Please share it on social media (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, email etc) by using social media buttons at the top of the blog. Or post to your personal blog and anywhere else you feel appropriate. Thank you.
As always, we welcome thoughts and remarks on ANY of the content above in the Comments section below…
Years ago, a policeman was your friend and defender. Things have changed now that Police Forces have become commercial organisations, dedicated to producing a profit by taking money from you in the form of Fixed Penalty Notices, Speeding Fines, Parking Fines and any number of other charges. Knowledge is Power, explains why;
Each individual ‘Police Force’ is a commercial company, it has NO AUTHORITY to enforce anything, any more than a McDonalds or a BurgerKing has. The men & women that work under the banner of their local ‘Police Force’ have two separate roles. When they take up their occupation, they take an ‘oath of office’ pledging to uphold the ‘Common Law‘. That oath, and nothing else gives them the Authority to act to enforce ‘Common Law’ – that is, the few things which are listed in our ‘Legalese – Acts & Statutes‘ page above.
‘Common Law‘ DOES NOT authorise them to do anything connected with so-called ‘Government’ Statutes & Acts and so they have been trained to use ‘Legalese’ to entrap UN-INFORMED members of the Public! To be fair, it is highly likely that even the members or the Police Force are aware of what they are doing and do not understand the difference between ‘Legal Statutes‘ (which are optional) and the ‘Lawful‘ Common Law requirements which apply to EVERYONE and are NOT optional.
PLEASE DONT GET US WRONG – A lot of Policemen and Policewomen do a great job and assist members of the Public, sometimes above and beyond the requirements of there job – opposing bullying, intimidation, fraud etc. and comforting in cases of bereavement or injury. BUT, the commercial companies who control the Police Force are working extremely hard to end this sort of positive behavior, using ridiculous Health & Safety regulations as an excuse, even to the extent that Police Officers are instructed for example to stand by and watch somebody drown and not attempt to save them! This is not the choice of the ‘Officer’ but the instructions of the owners of the company.
SO, because these thousands & thousands of ‘invented‘ offenses dont apply to ANYBODY unless they agree to be bound via ‘consent‘ it becomes essential for a ‘Police Officer‘ to (possibly with out knowing) persuade a member of the Public to agree to subject him/herself to these unnecessary restrictions and agree to pay invented cash penalties to the local commercial company called the ‘Police Force’ or ‘Constabulary‘. The normal first attempt to establish this spurious dominance of the ‘Police Officer’ is by him asking for your name. This is NOT an INNOCENT question and it is essential that you are VERY CAREFUL in what you say as there are verbal ‘Legalese’ TRAPS all over the place!
One suitable reply is “The Law does not require me to provide that information” which is entirely correct and avoids the first major pitfall, and no matter how often the question is asked, the answer always remains the SAME. It is also vitally IMPORTANT not to argue with a Police Officer as that is another ‘Legalese‘ TRAP which makes you subject to the thousands of hateful regulations solely designed to part you of your MONEY. So, only answer questions (ideally with a non aggressive question) and dont volunteer ANY INFORMATION AT ALL.
So, here are some examples to help you understand;
If a Police Officer says “you were exceeding the speed limit!” you could say “Was I?” as you DONT ARGUE, nor do you point out that ‘Common Law’ does not require anybody to keep to the speed limits, obey road signs, park only where directed ETC. even though that is perfectly TRUE!
Under ‘Common Law’ an offense has only been committed IF there is a VICTIM (somebody who has been killed or injured, had possessions damaged or stolen or who has been defrauded) SO, if the Police Officer keeps pushing you to agree to pay his company money when you DONT need to, then a good question to ask is “Who is the Victim?” or alternatively some thing like “What is the charge? or am I free to go?” if you stick to these things, then the Police Officer has nothing to work on as you have not agreed to be bound by ‘Statutes‘ as you have not provided a NAME and ADDRESS for him to write on an invoice/bill or ‘Fixed Penalty Notice‘ as they like to call it! and you have not entered into a ‘controversy’ by arguing with him or her into ‘dishonor’ by refusing them point blank.
AMAZING STUFF, Yup…
But there is one thing, and that is, you MUST NOT be agressive or offensive in any way, you MUST NOT do anything which he tells you to do because if you do then those charming ‘Legalese’ people can see that as you agreeing to ‘Stand Under’ them and then become subject to his ‘Legal’ (NOT LAWFUL) authority, and so become liable to those thousands of cunning plans called ‘Statutes’ carefully crafted in order to rob you in a PERFECTLY ‘LEGAL‘ WAY!
One thing which any Police Officer needs to become aware of is the FACT that they do NOT have any security provided by the ‘Police Force‘ which employs them. In any situation which does not involve ‘Common Law’ the Police Officer is on his own, acting as an individual and as such is wide open to actions against him either under ‘Common Law’ if he is acting unlawfully or by Civil Court action if his actions warrant it.
See, it all falls flat on its face for them if they cannot establish a ‘JOINDER’ or more aptly named a ‘Pretensive Joinder’ which is where a human agrees voluntarily to represent the ‘Legal Fiction / ‘Strawman‘ and so become subject to them Legal ‘Statutes’…If they cannot get ‘JOINDER‘ then the presumed authority of a Police Officer does not exist in ANY RESPECT and he is acting solely as an individual whose only authority is to enforce ‘Common Law‘ and NOTHING ELSE.
We are all sovereign, but most of us have chosen to be subjects.
As a Sovereign: No process of law—“color” of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.—can operate upon you; no agent and/or agency of government, including courts, can gain jurisdiction over you, without your consent! You do not exist within their fictional commercial venue.
What/Who is The STRAWMAN
Demand in Abatement
The definition of abatement is the removal of a problem which is against public or private policy, or endangers others. A chancery practice, a suspension of all proceedings in a suit, from the want of proper parties capable of proceeding therein. It differs from an abatement at law in this, that in the latter the action is in general entirely dead, and cannot be revived An abatement demand pleading, is the overthrow of an action in consequence of some error committed in bringing or conducting it when the plaintiff is not forever barred from bringing another action. Abatement is by PRIVATE a letter to the Judges chambers (in Camera). There can be no demurrer in abatement.
A Demand in abatement is issued by absolute right pursuant to applicable to such acts of Blasphemy; against the foreign agents acting as though they are representing the LAW, When in Truth they are acting for alien enemy agencies of a statutorily created, foreign de-facto corporations known as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, in any of the 50 states in any U.S. District Court and the like, acting under the color of law.
The said agents are imposing a suretyship, by attaching an illegally presumed persona designata, nom ae guerre, created by them as your STRAWMAN NAME, upon this good and lawful living man, (Your Name Upper and Lower Case first and middle Name: family (Your Last Name), suae polestate esse.
First and foremost it is Blasphemy against Yeshua-bin-Yahweh, the trespass is without authority, is counter to man’s morals, being in the nature of a Praemunire which is outlawed by the general custom in this nation state and, thus, is in violation of the Right of Privacy, the lex non scripta, which is the jus publicum in this nation state:…
Learn how to create the Request of Abatement
The people granted authority to the state legislature to adjudicate only a few matters: Actions at law, actions in equity, and actions under the rule of necessity (military). Admiralty was remanded to the federal government and the states (are supposed to) have no authority to legislate in this jurisdiction. There was a time when someone aggrieved of harm would file a tort at law. Moreover, the nature of the action governed the rules of the procedure.
If there was a breach of contract, then this was an equity matter. If the aggrieved party could allege a tortious breach of contract, this matter was moved from the equity side of the court into the law side. Understanding this you will learn to handle your own affairs as a creditor.