Years ago, a policeman was your friend and defender. Things have changed now that Police Forces have become commercial organisations, dedicated to producing a profit by taking money from you in the form of Fixed Penalty Notices, Speeding Fines, Parking Fines and any number of other charges. Knowledge is Power, explains why;
Each individual ‘Police Force’ is a commercial company, it has NO AUTHORITY to enforce anything, any more than a McDonalds or a BurgerKing has. The men & women that work under the banner of their local ‘Police Force’ have two separate roles. When they take up their occupation, they take an ‘oath of office’ pledging to uphold the ‘Common Law‘. That oath, and nothing else gives them the Authority to act to enforce ‘Common Law’ – that is, the few things which are listed in our ‘Legalese – Acts & Statutes‘ page above.
‘Common Law‘ DOES NOT authorise them to do anything connected with so-called ‘Government’ Statutes & Acts and so they have been trained to use ‘Legalese’ to entrap UN-INFORMED members of the Public! To be fair, it is highly likely that even the members or the Police Force are aware of what they are doing and do not understand the difference between ‘Legal Statutes‘ (which are optional) and the ‘Lawful‘ Common Law requirements which apply to EVERYONE and are NOT optional.
PLEASE DONT GET US WRONG – A lot of Policemen and Policewomen do a great job and assist members of the Public, sometimes above and beyond the requirements of there job – opposing bullying, intimidation, fraud etc. and comforting in cases of bereavement or injury. BUT, the commercial companies who control the Police Force are working extremely hard to end this sort of positive behavior, using ridiculous Health & Safety regulations as an excuse, even to the extent that Police Officers are instructed for example to stand by and watch somebody drown and not attempt to save them! This is not the choice of the ‘Officer’ but the instructions of the owners of the company.
SO, because these thousands & thousands of ‘invented‘ offenses dont apply to ANYBODY unless they agree to be bound via ‘consent‘ it becomes essential for a ‘Police Officer‘ to (possibly with out knowing) persuade a member of the Public to agree to subject him/herself to these unnecessary restrictions and agree to pay invented cash penalties to the local commercial company called the ‘Police Force’ or ‘Constabulary‘. The normal first attempt to establish this spurious dominance of the ‘Police Officer’ is by him asking for your name. This is NOT an INNOCENT question and it is essential that you are VERY CAREFUL in what you say as there are verbal ‘Legalese’ TRAPS all over the place!
One suitable reply is “The Law does not require me to provide that information” which is entirely correct and avoids the first major pitfall, and no matter how often the question is asked, the answer always remains the SAME. It is also vitally IMPORTANT not to argue with a Police Officer as that is another ‘Legalese‘ TRAP which makes you subject to the thousands of hateful regulations solely designed to part you of your MONEY. So, only answer questions (ideally with a non aggressive question) and dont volunteer ANY INFORMATION AT ALL.
So, here are some examples to help you understand;
If a Police Officer says “you were exceeding the speed limit!” you could say “Was I?” as you DONT ARGUE, nor do you point out that ‘Common Law’ does not require anybody to keep to the speed limits, obey road signs, park only where directed ETC. even though that is perfectly TRUE!
Under ‘Common Law’ an offense has only been committed IF there is a VICTIM (somebody who has been killed or injured, had possessions damaged or stolen or who has been defrauded) SO, if the Police Officer keeps pushing you to agree to pay his company money when you DONT need to, then a good question to ask is “Who is the Victim?” or alternatively some thing like “What is the charge? or am I free to go?” if you stick to these things, then the Police Officer has nothing to work on as you have not agreed to be bound by ‘Statutes‘ as you have not provided a NAME and ADDRESS for him to write on an invoice/bill or ‘Fixed Penalty Notice‘ as they like to call it! and you have not entered into a ‘controversy’ by arguing with him or her into ‘dishonor’ by refusing them point blank.
AMAZING STUFF, Yup…
But there is one thing, and that is, you MUST NOT be agressive or offensive in any way, you MUST NOT do anything which he tells you to do because if you do then those charming ‘Legalese’ people can see that as you agreeing to ‘Stand Under’ them and then become subject to his ‘Legal’ (NOT LAWFUL) authority, and so become liable to those thousands of cunning plans called ‘Statutes’ carefully crafted in order to rob you in a PERFECTLY ‘LEGAL‘ WAY!
One thing which any Police Officer needs to become aware of is the FACT that they do NOT have any security provided by the ‘Police Force‘ which employs them. In any situation which does not involve ‘Common Law’ the Police Officer is on his own, acting as an individual and as such is wide open to actions against him either under ‘Common Law’ if he is acting unlawfully or by Civil Court action if his actions warrant it.
See, it all falls flat on its face for them if they cannot establish a ‘JOINDER’ or more aptly named a ‘Pretensive Joinder’ which is where a human agrees voluntarily to represent the ‘Legal Fiction / ‘Strawman‘ and so become subject to them Legal ‘Statutes’…If they cannot get ‘JOINDER‘ then the presumed authority of a Police Officer does not exist in ANY RESPECT and he is acting solely as an individual whose only authority is to enforce ‘Common Law‘ and NOTHING ELSE.
We are all sovereign, but most of us have chosen to be subjects.
As a Sovereign: No process of law—“color” of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.—can operate upon you; no agent and/or agency of government, including courts, can gain jurisdiction over you, without your consent! You do not exist within their fictional commercial venue.
What/Who is The STRAWMAN
Demand in Abatement
The definition of abatement is the removal of a problem which is against public or private policy, or endangers others. A chancery practice, a suspension of all proceedings in a suit, from the want of proper parties capable of proceeding therein. It differs from an abatement at law in this, that in the latter the action is in general entirely dead, and cannot be revived An abatement demand pleading, is the overthrow of an action in consequence of some error committed in bringing or conducting it when the plaintiff is not forever barred from bringing another action. Abatement is by PRIVATE a letter to the Judges chambers (in Camera). There can be no demurrer in abatement.
A Demand in abatement is issued by absolute right pursuant to applicable to such acts of Blasphemy; against the foreign agents acting as though they are representing the LAW, When in Truth they are acting for alien enemy agencies of a statutorily created, foreign de-facto corporations known as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, in any of the 50 states in any U.S. District Court and the like, acting under the color of law.
The said agents are imposing a suretyship, by attaching an illegally presumed persona designata, nom ae guerre, created by them as your STRAWMAN NAME, upon this good and lawful living man, (Your Name Upper and Lower Case first and middle Name: family (Your Last Name), suae polestate esse.
First and foremost it is Blasphemy against Yeshua-bin-Yahweh, the trespass is without authority, is counter to man’s morals, being in the nature of a Praemunire which is outlawed by the general custom in this nation state and, thus, is in violation of the Right of Privacy, the lex non scripta, which is the jus publicum in this nation state:…
Learn how to create the Request of Abatement
The people granted authority to the state legislature to adjudicate only a few matters: Actions at law, actions in equity, and actions under the rule of necessity (military). Admiralty was remanded to the federal government and the states (are supposed to) have no authority to legislate in this jurisdiction. There was a time when someone aggrieved of harm would file a tort at law. Moreover, the nature of the action governed the rules of the procedure.
If there was a breach of contract, then this was an equity matter. If the aggrieved party could allege a tortious breach of contract, this matter was moved from the equity side of the court into the law side. Understanding this you will learn to handle your own affairs as a creditor.